<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PMI Annual Project Manager/Deputy Project Manager Meeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennisstevens.com/2009/01/08/pmi-annual-project-managerdeputy-project-manager-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennisstevens.com/2009/01/08/pmi-annual-project-managerdeputy-project-manager-meeting/</link>
	<description>Enabling the Agile Enterprise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:15:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.dennisstevens.com/2009/01/08/pmi-annual-project-managerdeputy-project-manager-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennisstevens.com/?p=28#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Yes. I will bring that up. It will have to be in the next release of the standard, but hopefully we can get the interim documents and presentations to that standard. Also, I would love to see your documentation when it is completed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I will bring that up. It will have to be in the next release of the standard, but hopefully we can get the interim documents and presentations to that standard. Also, I would love to see your documentation when it is completed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen B. Alleman</title>
		<link>http://www.dennisstevens.com/2009/01/08/pmi-annual-project-managerdeputy-project-manager-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen B. Alleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennisstevens.com/?p=28#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Dennis,
I&#039;m just now going through the PMBOK. 
During your discussions there could you float the idea of using an industry standard notation for the process and document relationships. IDEF0 comes to mind, but SysML is another. I&#039;m assemblying an IDEF0 description of the Risk section (Chapter 11) in my study efforts for the PMP-RMP.
The current notation mixes, nound and verbs in the same box notation, has poorly traceable inter-section connection traceability. As well it mixes constarints, mechanisims with the consumption and productiuon of data.
This is a golden opportunity to move PMI into the modern world of process management normality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,<br />
I&#8217;m just now going through the PMBOK.<br />
During your discussions there could you float the idea of using an industry standard notation for the process and document relationships. IDEF0 comes to mind, but SysML is another. I&#8217;m assemblying an IDEF0 description of the Risk section (Chapter 11) in my study efforts for the PMP-RMP.<br />
The current notation mixes, nound and verbs in the same box notation, has poorly traceable inter-section connection traceability. As well it mixes constarints, mechanisims with the consumption and productiuon of data.<br />
This is a golden opportunity to move PMI into the modern world of process management normality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

